Advertisement
Home arrow Digital Warfare arrow Privacy for (US) soldiers
Saturday, 22 November 2008
 
 
Last week attacks
O.S.  Defs.  %
Linux  8778  71.58%
Win 2003  1950  15.90%
Win 2000  722  5.89%
Solaris 9/10  402  3.28%
FreeBSD  226  1.84%
Other  185  1.51%

Total attacks: 12263 of which 4619 single ip and 7644 mass defacements

Main Menu
Home
Digital Warfare
Geopolitics
ITsec News
ITsec Advisories
Test Drive
360°
Digital Attacks Archive
Zone-H events
Publications
Zone-H Friends/Partners
Contact Us
Search
Download Area
Zone-H forum
About this website
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Visitors' Map
Privacy for (US) soldiers PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 7
PoorBest 
Thursday, 08 February 2007

 US Army declared war against military data leaks but its security program hasn’t  met with enthusiasms by  privacy groups that harshly criticized the initiative to monitor and eventually censor websites and soldiers' blogs .

 

According to the Register  , the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) sued the US  Department of Defense after the Department of Defense and Army failed to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests about the blog monitoring programme.

 All federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and the Army are required to keep to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that burdens institutions to disclose records requested in writing by any person. The EFF focuses on the fact that an Army unit called the Army Web Risk Assessment Cell (AWRAC) has the charge to notify webmasters and bloggers when it finds "sensitive information".

 

Anyway bloggers sometimes complaint that they are often  coerced to censor also those passages that have nothing to do with military information but actually deal with their personal feelings about war.

"Soldiers should be free to blog their thoughts at this critical point in the national debate on the war in Iraq," EFF staff attorney Marcia Hofmann said. "Of course, a military effort requires some level of secrecy. But the public has a right to know if the Army is silencing soldiers' opinions as well. That's why the Department of Defense must release information on how this program works without delay."

On the other hand, an Army statement highlights that : "AWRAC notifies webmasters and blog writers when they find documents, pictures, and other items that may compromise security. AWRAC reviews for information on public websites which may provide an adversary with sensitive information that could put soldiers or family members in danger. AWRAC assesses the risk the information poses to the military and determines if the next step is to request the information be removed."

In spite of the fact that the AWRAC has no legal authority to impose changes to postings or to take down a certain website, no member of the US Army would dare make a stand. Indeed, the Unit has much influence since just the fact that a soldier's superiors get informed about similar facts, could represent a concern for the soldier himself. 

This initiative to support soldiers' right of expression  is a part of the EFF’s  FLAG Project , which uses FOIA requests and litigation to cast a light on government'sAbuses about privacy.  


Comments Index (Total Messages: 1)
:x Written by Guest on 2007-02-09 08:09:03

Powered by a Zone-H(ified) version of AkoComment 3.0!


DISCLAIMER: Forum postings are the opinion of the posting author alone, and should not be taken as the opinion of Zone-h. The   author is entirely and solely responsible for all content that he/she uploads, posts, or otherwise transmits via the website. Zone-h is not responsible for such content. However, Zone-h shall have the right, but not the obligation, to delete, move, or edit any content that violates this agreement or is otherwise objectionable as determined by Zone-h in its sole discretion and without notice.
 
< Prev   Next >
Advertisement
 
Top! Top!