Advertisement
Home arrow ITsec News arrow Do you trust your Bluetooth?
Friday, 25 July 2008
 
 
Last week attacks
O.S.  Defs.  %
Linux  5388  69.02%
Win 2003  1841  23.58%
Win 2000  290  3.72%
FreeBSD  166  2.13%
MacOSX  67  0.86%
Other  54  0.69%

Total attacks: 7806 of which 2243 single ip and 5563 mass defacements

Main Menu
Home
Digital Warfare
Geopolitics
ITsec News
ITsec Advisories
Test Drive
360°
Digital Attacks Archive
Zone-H events
Publications
Zone-H Friends/Partners
Contact Us
Search
Download Area
Zone-H forum
About this website
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Visitors' Map
Do you trust your Bluetooth? PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 11
PoorBest 
Wednesday, 08 November 2006

 Imagine such  scenario: airport in XYZ (enter here your favourite airport name).There are travellers queuing  for  check-in, travellers already checked, travellers waiting for boarding: a lot of people who spend the time left before leaving by reading, wandering around, shopping at “Duty Free” or working, using their technological equipments...  

This could seem to be the  picture of a normal working day in an airport, but for crackers... ... it represents a sort of Paradise where enabled Wi-Fi and Bluetooth devices work as  entry point to corporate and private data : What could a cracker ask more ?

The dangers and threats of Wi-Fi connections are commonly known but hardly anyone of those people in the airport would think they are likely to be potential targets for cyber criminals.

What if they knew  which kind of nasty  problems could be  conveyed by Bluetooth devices?



On this proposal, Thierry Zoller and Kevin Finiste, two security experts who collaborated with Apple, Symantec, IBM, McAfee and many other companies, presented a Bluetooth live hacking  session during Hack.Lu 2006, an international conference held in Luxemburg from October 19th to 21st.
The results of 1 hour Bluetooth wardriving session aren’t so surprising to us:295 unique discoverable devices and lots of vulnerable ones that can be attacked through various methods and hacked provoking huge data exposures. It would be  possible, for example,  to read phonebooks and SMS messages, dial numbers, redirect calls and also carry out  wire(less)-tapping of BT headsets(!).


Of course we know that Bluetooth has a small range, but we know also (and crackers know it even better)  that a specific antenna would allow the attacker to reach BT devices placed hundreds of meters away, as testified by Mr.Zoller and Mr.Finistere who  reported to have achieved a device 2.6km far from the antenna: a new  world record.



On this proposal, some 0days for BT vulnerabilities have been already published: for example you can compromise Mac OS X 10.3 or 10.4  over
Obex . Then,  some Windows vulnerabilities  are also available.

Moreover, we have to  point out that not only Windows OS are at risk, but Macs are vulnerable as well.Indeed even if the related flaw for Macs is now  patched , we should not forget that it is possible to own internal networks over Bluetooth, in spite of which kind of computer is included in the network.


Comments Index (Total Messages: 2)
distance Written by Guest on 2006-11-09 15:20:10
Wow! Written by Guest on 2006-11-09 16:10:38

Powered by a Zone-H(ified) version of AkoComment 3.0!


DISCLAIMER: Forum postings are the opinion of the posting author alone, and should not be taken as the opinion of Zone-h. The   author is entirely and solely responsible for all content that he/she uploads, posts, or otherwise transmits via the website. Zone-h is not responsible for such content. However, Zone-h shall have the right, but not the obligation, to delete, move, or edit any content that violates this agreement or is otherwise objectionable as determined by Zone-h in its sole discretion and without notice.
 
< Prev   Next >
Advertisement
 
Top! Top!