| New York Times restricted for the Brits |
|
|
|
| Thursday, 31 August 2006 | |||||
|
As reported by MSBC the Times spokeswoman Diane McNulty declared on Tuesday that they "had clear legal advice that publication in the U.K. might run afoul of their law. It's a country that doesn't have the First Amendment, but it does have the free press. We felt we should respect their country's law." As most of us know, proxy servers and applications such as Tor could turn out to be really useful to move around this kind of obstacles, and the censored article can be posted on blogs or other online sources from elsewhere in the world. Law is Law, and it has to be respected but this specific law sounds anachronistic and strange now, in Europe, in the age of the Internet. Maybe it is just because we are so used to free information that we cannot accept any limitation when we try to get it.
Powered by a Zone-H(ified) version of AkoComment 3.0! DISCLAIMER: Forum postings are the opinion of the posting author alone, and should not be taken as the opinion of Zone-h. The author is entirely and solely responsible for all content that he/she uploads, posts, or otherwise transmits via the website. Zone-h is not responsible for such content. However, Zone-h shall have the right, but not the obligation, to delete, move, or edit any content that violates this agreement or is otherwise objectionable as determined by Zone-h in its sole discretion and without notice. |
|||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




Real censorship doesn’t exist only in far dictatorships, it is indeed a subtle danger we can easily came across also in our western and developed countries, and Zone-H will never stop saying that we must pay attention.






